Most previous work in explanation-based generalization (EBG) of plans dealt with totally ordered plans.
In most previous studies, this explanation for the punishment of atypical behaviour has not been ruled out, because the costs of punishment increase with the number of individuals that are punished (e.g. [ 8, 9]).
Without dismissing other explanations, most previous reports suggested that limitations in expression of transgenes in plants are mainly due to unfavorable mRNA metabolism, more specifically to reduced synthesis, premature polyadenylation, aberrant splicing and reduced stability of transcripts of foreign gene in plant cells (reviewed by Diehn et al. [ 40]).
The first explanation could be that, by contrast with most previous studies, we also adjusted for the season (since blood samples were exclusively collected in spring 2010, at a time when vitamin D is synthesized).
The complexity of the task used in this study may provide an explanation for this inconsistency with the findings of most previous studies.
This absence of evidence underlying some aspects of the guideline might be the explanation for the findings in our study – and in most previous studies – that adherence to elements of diabetes guidelines appears to have no effect on health outcomes.
Two likely explanations exist for the mortality reduction seen here, but not in most previous RRT studies.
Although this does not correspond with most previous studies, the study conducted by Ngyuen et al 8 provides a possible explanation for the current findings.
Most previous commentators focused on income inequality.
This is in good agreement with the previous explanations [17].
