Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
Perfect equality in terms of the (rho )-equivalent loss can never be achieved, unless the whole of the population is at the state of perfect health, and moreover the FHEC related to the most preferred bundle is the same for all types of preferences.
For any (iin N), let us denote this most preferred bundle by ({overline{x}}_{f_{i}}in X).
Specifically, the first value corresponds to the FHEC associated with the individual's most preferred bundle, a situation in which she would be endowed with a good medical disposition.
In such a case, unless the FHEC associated with the most preferred bundle is identical for all types, the (rho )-equivalent loss cannot be the same for all agents.
In such a situation the incentive-compatibility constraint would never be satisfied unless all individuals had the same value of the FHEC associated with their own respective most preferred bundle.
Such a situation, that we call the most preferred bundle, is defined as the choice that the individual would make, according to her ex post preferences and her initial resources, if she had the best medical disposition, that is, the good one.
Similar(54)
And most preferred milk over dark chocolate.
Based on these findings the authors recommend a 37 pin bundle as the minimum surrogate for a larger bundle, and 61 pins as the preferred bundle size.
This gives rise to his most preferred medical analogy.
Currently, the most preferred solvent is monoethnolamine (MEA).
Wind energy is the second most preferred option, with 69% supporting it in their preferred energy mix.
More suggestions(15)
most natural bundle
most preferred Yang
most preferred colour
most preferred guideline
most preferred method
most preferred digester
most preferred treatment
most preferred refuge
most preferred surface
most Ubiquitous bundle
most preferred investment
most preferred livestock
most preferred water
most preferred option
most preferred channel
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com