Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Most papers evaluated multiple quality indicators.
Similar(59)
Measuring the outcome of an intervention is central to the practice of evidence based medicine, and most research papers evaluating patient outcomes now incorporate some form of patient-based metric, such as questionnaires or performance tests.
Consistent with that, most of the research papers evaluated herein were authored by more researchers than the students and their senior advisors (see Additional file 2).
Where papers evaluated a number of different follow-up periods, we chose to report the longest follow up period as we felt that such measures provided the most conservative estimate of effectiveness.
Sixteen papers evaluated need factors, 15 evaluated predisposing factors and ten papers evaluated enabling factors.
All other papers evaluated unenhanced CT.
Three papers evaluated testing PWID in drug services.
Papers evaluated as 'low' were excluded from the Data Extraction Phase.
Not all papers evaluated all patients' genotypes, therefore, for genotype 2/3, four papers were included in the meta-analysis and for genotype 1, six papers were evaluated.
Many, if not most, papers that have evaluated the efficacy of genetic monitoring as a conservation and management tool have been theoretical or simulation studies (e.g., Antao et al. 2010; Waples and Do 2010) rather than ones based on empirical data (but see Ovenden et al. 2007).
4. Write response papers evaluating NASA's official mission statement.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com