Sentence examples for most pairwise comparisons from inspiring English sources

Most pairwise comparisons of ΦST among populations within each clade, however, were not significant.

A lower degree of dependence (p<0.05) is also observed for most pairwise comparisons between BLAST-based orthology detection methods (RBH, Inparanoid, OrthoMCL, KOG), all of which rely on RBH as their first step.

Most pairwise comparisons showed significant differences in haplotype distributions (mtDNA FST) even across localities that shared one or more haplotypes (Fig. 5).

When parasitoids were grouped according to reproductive mode and host aphid, ignoring morphology (Table 6), nuclear and mitochondrial differentiation was also significant for most pairwise comparisons.

For most pairwise comparisons, especially for comparisons separated by two or more generations, using K, power for instant declines was >0.90.

Compared to this, when a six-parameter weighting scheme (see below for details) was implemented, the P values for most pairwise comparisons increased greatly.

At a smaller spatial scale, most pairwise FST and ΦST comparisons among males between Breeding Stocks B and C were not significant (Table 7).

Most pairwise FST comparisons were significant by permutation test except for populations in close proximity to each other (Table 4).

Most intriguingly, pairwise comparisons of TRAV usage between donors produced a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.90 ± 0.04 (mean ± SD), indicating marked similarity in the TRAV frequency among individuals.

With only a few exceptions, purifying selection, as indicated by Ka/Ks < 1, appears to be in place for most of pairwise comparisons (Table 4).

The two most similar pairwise comparisons were between P. gingivalis W50 and P. gingivalis W83 (0.16) and between Porphyromonas asaccharolytica DSM20707 and P. asaccharolytica PR426713P (0.23).