Sentence examples for most negative peak from inspiring English sources

The most negative peak is ascribed to macrodefects-induced deposition on polymer-free sites on the electrode surface.

The FN amplitudes were extracted as the most negative peak in the time window between 225 and 325 ms following feedback presentation.

VEP components were identified according to their latencies: N1 was defined as the most negative peak between 60 and 90 ms, P1 as the most positive peak following N1 between 80 and 120 ms, and N2 as the most negative peak following P1 at between 125 and 150 ms (Fig. 1).

Checkerboard TR-VEP components were identified according to their latencies: N1 as the most negative peak between 60 and 90 ms, P1 as the most positive peak following N1 between 80 and 120 ms, and N2 as the most negative peak following P1 between 125 and 150 ms (Figure 1).

VEP components were identified according to their latencies from the stimulus: N1 was defined as the most negative peak between 60 and 90 ms, P1 as the most positive peak following N1 between 80 and 120 ms, and N2 as the most negative peak following P1 at between 125 and 150 ms (Fig. 1).

VEPs components were identified according to their latencies: N1 was the most negative peak between 60 and 90 ms, and P1 was the most positive peak following N1 between 80 and 120 ms. The N2 was the most negative peak following P1 between 125 and 150 ms (Fig. 2).

A peak is the highest (most negative) point previous to the decline, and must be ≥10 μV (the threshold of the noise level).

The peak-to-peak N1 P1 and P1-N2 amplitudes were measured, N1 being the most negative point around 70 ms latency after the stimulus (range 60 90), P1 the most positive around 100 ms latency (range 80 130) and N2 the most negative point following P1 between 90 and 200 ms.

The peak latencies were determined from the most positive (eP3a and lP3a) or the most negative (LN) peak within those windows, and the mean peak amplitudes were calculated from ±20 ms time window around the peak latencies.

The most critical positive peak area-averaged net pressures decrease with increase in parapet height, and the most critical negative peak values of building models with a parapet are smaller than those without a parapet.

The results indicate that the most critical negative peak area-averaged net pressure coefficients considering all wind directions and all panels show an increasing tendency with increase in side ratio, but that the most critical positive peak values show no significant change.