Sentence examples for most modeling studies from inspiring English sources

On the other hand, despite great efforts have been currently made to use the most accurate and up-to-date data sources to provide a realistic simulation of T2DM in Argentina, the model has a limitation shared by most modeling studies, namely, the uncertainty around projecting long-term outcomes based on clinical input data from a short-term study.

However, in most modeling studies on tool wear and electrode shape, the sparking process is only factorized by the geometric configuration, i.e. the distance between electrodes.

This criterion was used because a calibration NRMSE of <10%% is considered to be sufficient for most modeling studies according to Mr. Daniel Gomes, an instructor for the National Ground Water Association's short-course on MODFLOW (D. Gomes short-course lecture 11 June 2009).

Until recently, most modeling studies of the DISC have concentrated on the key role of c-FLIP in mediating life/death decisions at CD95.

Most modeling studies in the current literature have been carried out with a view to predicting population-level effects in a specific natural system from information on individual-level effects in the key species concerned.

Lastly, most modeling studies of synaptic plasticity using STDP rules assume that synaptic modification leads to changes in spiking (Gerstner et al., 1996; Song and Abbott, 2001) with a recent study suggesting that STDP underlies sensory map plasticity in the young and adult cortex (Young et al., 2007).

Most PEMEC modeling studies so far have mainly focused on its electrochemical performance prediction and analysis, and fundamental understanding of the effect of multiphase transport on the cell performance is still lacking.

In most other modeling studies, spectra at a source level are prescribed based on observational constraints, or simply tuned to obtain desired simulated fields.

Most predictive modeling studies to date have made the a priori assumption that CWD is directly transmitted [27], [28], [29] (but see [59]); however, these studies struggle to capture both the comparatively low prevalence growth rates and the relatively high peak prevalences observed in Colorado or Wyoming's epidemics, for example.

Of note, if we consider only one child per mother – the assumption imposed by most MTCT modeling studies – we obtain an ICER of $1,300 per QALY gained, a value 75% higher than our initial estimate, highlighting the importance of including future pregnancies in cost-effectiveness estimates.

In most contaminant transport modeling studies, only the macropores that are visible at the soil surface are considered.