Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Wrinkling and pigmentary changes are directly associated with premature photo-aging and are considered its most important cutaneous manifestations.
The three most important cutaneous species are P. acnes, P. avidum and P. granulosum; these species can be found on the skin of virtually every human being, and they are also found on other tissue sites, including the gastrointestinal tract, lungs, and the prostate [ 2- 6].
Similar(58)
Solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation is the main source of vitamin D production and is also the most important environmental risk factor for cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) development.
The number and type of melanocytic nevi are among the most important known predictors of risk for cutaneous malignant melanoma.
Beside the cutaneous manifestations, the most important concern in EPP patients is the development of cholestasis with rapid accumulation of protoporphyrin in hepatobiliary structures resulting in severe liver damage and hepatic failure.
Breslow tumor thickness at presentation remains the most important single prognostic factor for patients with cutaneous melanoma [ 36].
Breslow tumor thickness (BT) is one of the most important predictors of prognosis for invasive primary cutaneous melanoma [ 5– 8].
The presence of nodal metastases in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma is the most important factor that adversely affects the biological behavior and is related to poor prognosis.
Tumour thickness is currently the most reliable predictor of recurrence for primary cutaneous melanoma and the single most important prognostic factor (Stadelmann et al, 1998).
For the past 20 years thickness of the primary tumour has been accepted as the most important guide to prognosis for patients with primary cutaneous malignant melanoma.
In healthy people the most important sources of the vitamin D are the cutaneous production of vitamin D stimulated by solar radiation and dietary intake.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com