Sentence examples for most hotspot sizes from inspiring English sources

Figure 5, A C, shows that for uncorrelated traits the Q- and N-methods were conservative, below target levels, whereas the NL-method shows error rates about the right target levels for most hotspot sizes.

Most hotspot chains in the Pacific are younger.

The hotspot on chromosome 7 was significant up to size 499, and the hotspot on chromosome 15 (higher peak) was significant for hotspot sizes 2 129 and 132 143.

The NL-method controls the genome-wide error rate across a range of possible hotspot sizes.

These extreme examples illustrate the effect of phenotype correlation on QTL hotspot sizes.

The presence of the hotspots greatly reduces the operational voltage and improves the current efficiency of the devices, which are strongly dependent on the hotspot size.

The approximate solution bridges exact solutions at two limits of hotspot size: infinitesimal hotspot at the center and uniform heat flux across the spreader.

Figure 3 connects hotspot size to quantile-based threshold.

This hotspot size significance profile depicts a sliding window of hotspot size thresholds ranging from n = 1, … ,  N, where N = 560 corresponds to the hotspot size threshold derived from the N method.

For example, the chromosome 5 hotspot was significant up to size 49, meaning that >1 trait mapped to the hotspot locus with LOD > 7.07, >2 traits mapped to the hotspot locus with LOD > 6.46, and so on up to hotspot size 49 where >49 traits mapped to the hotspot locus with LOD > 4.93.

Given a fixed mapping threshold, the N-method determines the hotspot size expected by chance.