Sentence examples for most frequent implementation from inspiring English sources

The most frequent implementation strategies provided to speech pathologists were support from colleagues, educational meetings, and/or workplace policies.

The findings show that the most frequent implementation factors common to all user groups were: design and technical concerns, ease of use, interoperability, privacy and security, costs, productivity, familiarity and ability with EHR, motivation to use EHR, patient and health professional interaction, and workload and lack of time.

The most frequent implementation of clinical microdialysis is in neurocritical care monitoring of energy-related small molecules in the brain ECF, which has demonstrated abnormalities in brain metabolism after head injury that relate statistically to clinical outcome 4. Clinical microdialysis catheters have nominal molecular weight cut-offs of 20 or 100 kDa.

Limited access expensive drugs, suggested by the guidelines, was the most frequent barrier to guidelines implementation that was reported.

Just over half (56%) of the proposals included an explicit rationale for conducting the qualitative research with the trial, the most frequent being to optimise implementation into clinical practice or to interpret trial findings.

Feeding via gastrostomy is a method of nutritional support used in patients with various conditions; however, the chronic impairment of the CNS and neuromuscular disorders constitutes the most frequent indications for its implementation in pediatrics.

This review reported that providing reminders was the most frequent strategy evaluated and was moderately effective in improving guideline implementation.

Although the algorithm does not obtain optimal results for all history-based policies, the results obtained for most frequent policies are equivalent to those obtained by label-based implementations [27].

The most frequent recommendation in this priority area was the need to implement communication and training strategies for civil society, designed to improve understanding and monitoring of the implementation of recommendations related to the other priority areas.

Also, further evaluation needs to be done to understand why key gaps to LM implementation such as funding received low importance scores, especially when reimbursement was the most frequent domain mentioned in the narrative comments.

The most frequent recommendation in this priority area was the decentralization of health care programs for which the perceived average implementation was scored at 50%% although this was reported in only two countries (Bolivia and Ecuador).