Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
This essential information is used by the most frequent conventional optimization algorithms (SLP, MMA, Feasible directions) in order to reach the optimal solution.
The most frequent conventional haplotypes of these genes, except 1A and 1A 5, can be unambiguously identified.
Primary care is the most frequent conventional medical service used by patients with pain in the UK.
On the basis of the differences in non-synonymous SNPs (SFTPA1-aa19, -aa50, -aa219, SFTPA2-aa9, -aa91, -aa223) the most frequent conventional haplotypes of these genes, except 1A and 1A 5, can be unambiguously identified (see Table E1 in Additional File 1).
Similar(56)
The most frequent complication of conventional TURP is perioperative bleeding, which, in a significant number of cases, may necessitate blood transfusion.
The most frequent subtype is the conventional or clear cell carcinoma, which comprises 88% of all renal cell carcinomas, followed by papillary carcinoma (10%) and chromophobe carcinoma (2%).
In contrast, there are three relevant CC terms out of the top ten most frequent cellular compartments where the conventional homology-based approach predicted host-pathogen PPIs targeted H. sapiens proteins locate at.
This formulation has significant advantages in terms of tolerability compared to conventional doxorubicin: the most frequent toxicities consist of cutaneous and mucosal toxicity (hand-foot syndrome and stomatitis), with a very low rate of nausea, hair loss, extravasation-related necrosis or reduction in the ventricular ejection fraction [ 15- 17].
Most (∼75%) of the tumours are classified as clear cell (conventional) and the next most frequent subtype is papillary RCC (∼15% of all cases) (Kovacs et al, 1997).
In the present study, E. coli was the second most frequent reason for clinical mastitis in both conventional (23.6%) and organic (19.1%) cows.
The most frequent type of renal cell carcinoma is the conventional (clear cell) one [ 2].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com