Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(15)
91.2% of residues are in the most favored region of the Ramachandran plot with 8.8% of residues in the additionally favored regions.
Ramachandran statistics of PML RING calculated by PROCHECK39 indicate that 99.4% of the atoms are in the most favored region, and 0.6% are in the allowed regions.
Here we report a robust three-dimensional structure (98.4% of the residues were in the most favored region and additional allowed region) which consist of N terminal small domain (residues 1 46), N terminal large domain (residues 46 298) and C terminal domain (residues 299 457).
The quality of the model, as analyzed by PROCHECK [27], shows that 93.4% of the residues are in the most favored region and the rest are in the additionally allowed region of the Ramachandran plots [28].
Ramachandran statistics (PROCHECK) [33] on the CupB2 structure indicate that 95.9 percent of the atoms are in the most favored region, and 4.1 percent are in the additionally allowed regions.
Ramachandran plot analysis using the program PROCHECK [17] showed that 60% residues were located in the most favored region, while 35.4% residues were located in the additional allowed regions.
Similar(45)
The result that over 90% of the residues were in the most favored regions indicated that the LhSorPR5 model presented was well built.
Ramachandran plot (Additional file 2: Figure S2) showed that 90.3% of residues in the LhSorP5CS model were in the most favored regions, 8.7% in the additional allowed regions, 0. 5% in the generously allowed regions; while only 0.5% of residues were in the disallowed regions.
A Ramachandran plot generated with Molprobity [55] indicated that 94.1% of all protein residues are in the most favored regions.
Conformationally, more than 90% of non-glycine residues were in the most favored regions of Ramachandran plot.
The obtained model shows Prosa Z-score of −2.97 and 93.2% of residues in the most favored regions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com