Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Most drilling fluids are too complex to be characterized by the Newtonian model.
Similar(59)
But as a matter of fact, most common drilling fluids in use are non-Newtonian fluids and their invasion cannot be investigated using mentioned model.
Water-Based mud (WBM) and Oil-Based mud (OBM) are the most common drilling fluids currently used and both have several characteristics that qualify them for High Pressure High Temperature (HPHT) purposes.
So, the most suitable drilling fluid for ERD is water-based mud.
There are some investigations on designing of biodiesel-based drilling fluids, but most of them are about water-free system instead of emulsion system which is the most commonly used.
The most dominant characteristics of aphron drilling fluids are the presence of aphrons and their rheology (Kinchen et al. 2001).
In oil-drilling operations, a filtrate reducer is the most commonly used drilling fluid additive.
From the review, it was gathered that the ANN technique is the most widely applied in drilling fluid engineering accounting for over 54% of the papers reviewed; while lost circulation problem was the most predicted well problem related to drilling fluids accounting for over 17% of the mud problems predicted.
Rheological properties of aqueous WHB solutions were compared to hydrocolloid systems prepared by using sodium bentonite, Xanthan Gum, and cellulosic biopolymer (CMC), which are some of the most common additives used for formulating drilling fluids in the oil and gas industry.
Filtration loss properties of aqueous WHB solutions were compared to hydrocolloid systems prepared by using sodium bentonite, Xanthan Gum, and cellulosic biopolymer (CMC), which are some of the most common additives used for formulating drilling fluids in the oil and gas industry.
Polyethylene glycol (PEG), a water-soluble polymer, has been widely used as the most promising polymer for designing hydrate inhibitive water-based drilling fluids.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com