Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Most currently available methods for microbial detection and discovery using nucleic acid samples are based on three technologies.
Most currently available methods first summarize observed polymorphism data through the site-frequency spectrum (SFS) of synonymous and nonsynonymous mutations (i.e., how many times do we observe a SNP present in 1, 2, 3, …, n – 1 copies in a sample comprising n sequenced chromosomes (Fig. 4).
Similar(58)
Most currently available phylogenetic methods cannot deal with strong aa compositional heterogeneity in the data [ 74], which may lead to false interpretations of evolutionary events[ 2, 14].
Most of the currently available methods were developed to synthesize the undamped vibration modes of the subsystems.
However, most of the currently available methods utilize the prior functional (GO) information to generate pre-defined sets of genes [17], [18].
Most of the currently available methods for protein subcellular localization can be readily applied to the majority of model plant species such as Arabidopsis and tobacco, which could, in principle, lend themselves as heterologous recipients for localization studies of proteins from non-model plant species [ 18, 19].
The dimeric probes could reliably detect 0.01 fg target genomic DNA, which is lower than the detection limits of most currently available molecular diagnostic methods, such as the conventional PCR and real-time PCR.
The BERA-based sensor was able to detect AFM1 rapidly (3min) at very low concentrations (5 pg/ml = 5 ppt), thus demonstrating a higher sensitivity than most currently available biosensor-based methods.
We discuss four models of statistical experiment explicitly or implicitly assumed by most if not all currently available methods of gene set analysis.
First, we clarify the statistical models and null hypotheses of most if not all currently available methods of gene-set enrichment, and we discuss which of the models disagree with the biological experiment.
The normalised read counts obtained from DESeq2 were used for all subsequent expression analyses, e.g. PCA, which were performed in R, with the exception of the differential gene expression analyses, which were performed using DESeq as it has been shown to be the most conservative of the currently available methods with the lowest false discovery rate [ 74].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com