Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Similar(60)
After 1000 steps, Celecoxib was the most commonly generated structure (about a third of the generated structures), followed by demethylated Celecoxib (also a third) whose SMILES is more likely according to the Prior with (log _e P = -15.2) but has a lower similarity ((J = 0.87)), resulting in an augmented likelihood equal to that of Celecoxib.
In addition to random distributions, Gleasonian distributions (indicating clear, but individualistic turnover between sites) were the most commonly identified structure.
However, MoS2 nanosheets, the most commonly investigated structure, easily tend to restack or aggregate and also present intrinsic poor electric conductivity, which limit their applications.
Cornea was found to be the most commonly affected structure in the eye in a case series studied by Sanjiv et al. [8], of which loss of corneal sensations was the most common finding which in our case was notably absent.
The most commonly invaded structure is the pericardium; followed by the pleura, lungs, phrenic nerve and superior vena cava (SVC).
The upper cervical spine shows signs of damage in 17 86% of patients with RA and is the most commonly involved structure after hands and feet [ 3].
As a result, tumour invasion of adjacent structures is common, occurring in 10 of the 13 cases in this study, with the seminal vesicles being the most commonly involved structure (n = 8), followed by bladder (n = 6), rectum (n = 2) and ureter (n = 1).
Global star and local ring are two most commonly used structures.
Tubular steel towers are the most commonly used structures to support wind converters.
Porous scaffolds, hydrogels, and fibers are the most commonly biomimetic structures used for bone and cartilage tissue engineering.
The most commonly infiltrated structures are found within the superior-lateral quadrant, such as the superior rectus muscle, lateral rectus muscle, lacrimal gland and eyelid.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com