Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
Metastases represent the most common orbital malignancy.
Lymphoma of the ocular adnexa is the most common orbital malignancy accounting for 55%% of adult malignant orbital tumours.
IOP is the most common cause of a painful orbital mass in adults and the third most common orbital disease after thyroid ophthalmopathy and lymphoproliferative disorders.
Orbital pseudotumor (an idiopathic orbital inflammation), a diagnosis of exclusion, is the third most common orbital disease, accounting for 5 6% of orbital disorders [1].
Lymphoma is the most common orbital malignancy accounting for 55% of all malignant orbital tumors in adults.
Similar(55)
Orbital lymphoma, the most common primary orbital malignancy in adults, usually manifests as a diffuse, solid, enhancing mass with molding around the globe on imaging studies, reflecting the irregular infiltration of orbital structures [ 23– 27].
However, orbital lymphomas are the most common primary orbital tumor in adults 60 years of age and older [ 10].
Orbital cavernous haemangiomas, the most common primary orbital tumour in adults, demonstrate a predilection to affect middle-aged women (60 70%), with a mean age of 43 to 48 years and range of 18 to 72 years based on several large series [ 4, 7, 9].
Dermoids are the most common congenital orbital lesions, accounting for about 25%% of all orbital biopsies.
Cavernous haemangioma is the most common primary orbital tumour in adults, accounting for 6% of all orbital lesions [ 1– 3].
Cavernous hemangioma is the most common benign orbital tumour-like condition in adults.
Related(20)
most common course
most common satellite
most common trajectory
most common track
most common examination
most common west
most common path
most common spatial
most common nodal
most common western
most common form
most common word
most common application
most common stem
most common scheme
most common family
most common homophone
most common problem
most common side
most primary orbital
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com