Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(59)
The isolation of Candida spp. as the most common isolate in our children with BSI, in contrast with studies that show CNS as the principal causing agent [ 2- 5, 23, 24], has already been pointed out [ 4].
In the current series, the most common isolate was C. albicans followed by Aspergillus fumigatus.
Gram-positive cocci were the most common isolate (n = 53; 60.9%) including Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 14/53; 16.1%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 13/53; 13.8%).
The most common isolate was Bacillus spp. (106/620, 17.1%) closely followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae (105/620, 16.9%), and coagulase-negative Staphylococci (97/620, 15.6%).
S. typhi was the most common isolate among those over 5 to 14 years of age.
Within the Burkholderiaceae, the species B. tuberum was the most common isolate but only carried by nematodes isolated from P. pinaster from Grândola (area Z).
Despite the rising trend of infections with non-albicans Candida species, Candida albicans remains the most common isolate recovered from bloodstream infections worldwide, with the frequency of occurrence ranging from 37% to 70%[6].
In our study Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most common isolate.
The most common isolate from lavage fluid of diseased calves in our study was M. dispar.
P. aeruginosa was the most common isolate from cutaneous pus (22.9%).
Similar(1)
Gram-positive bacteria (S. epidermidis and S. pneumoniae) are the most common isolates from polymicrobial endophthalmitis in the current series, contrasting with the previous series where Gram-negative bacteria and fungus were most common isolates.
More suggestions(14)
most common isolated
most prevalent isolate
most suitable isolate
most promising isolate
most infectious isolate
most efficient isolate
most unique isolate
most virulent isolate
most pathogenic isolate
most competent isolate
most potent isolate
most effective isolate
most common bacterium
most common antimicrobial
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com