Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
ITNs are one of the most common incidental findings on neck imaging.
We also discuss the most common incidental thyroid findings, best practices for their evaluation, and recommendations for their management.
CSP and WM abnormalities were the most common incidental findings (Table 2).
Of these findings, pulmonary nodules were the most common incidental finding (24.2% of all findings), and 41.3% of them requiring further follow-up imaging per radiology recommendation.
Of these findings, pulmonary nodules were the most common incidental finding observed in 63 participants (24.2% of all participants), and 41.3% of them required further follow-up imaging per radiology recommendation.
Similar(55)
Alongside an expected age related trend in white matter hyperintensities and silent brain infarcts, we found an increasing prevalence of all neoplastic incidental brain findings with age (fig 2), probably driven by the increasing prevalence of meningiomas,w1 which were the most common neoplastic incidental brain finding (fig 1).
Here, we use the most common term (incidental findings) and understand it to mean those that (1) have a potential health or reproductive impact on the study participant, (2) are outside the scope of the research question, and (3) are not searched for actively or intentionally.
The most common number of incidental findings per scan was 2, which occurred in 117 of 427 scans (Table 2).
The second most common form of incidental findings was those identified in the paranasal air sinuses, representing 30.9% of all findings.
Besides pulmonary nodules (n = 63), the five most common non-cardiac incidental findings were pleural effusions (n = 23), pericardial effusions (n = 23), hiatal hernias (n = 17), mediastinal lymph nodes (n = 16) and aortic aneurysms (n = 14); two associated with dissection.
Osteomas are the most common benign sinonasal tumour and are usually incidental findings at sinus CT.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com