Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
Under visible light activated (VLA), NF-TiO2 was the most active photocatalyst, PF-TiO2 was marginally active and S-TiO2 inactive.
TiO2 Degussa P25 showed to be the most active photocatalyst for both the degradation and mineralization of GEM.
The most active photocatalyst towards CH4 generation was TiO2 containing 20 wt.% of Fe calcinated at 500 °C.
The most active photocatalyst having CdZnS2 core and 10% Pt shell showed 24.0 mLg−1 h−1 (963.6 μmol g−1 hydrogenrogevolutionion rate with 4.01% solar energy conversion efficiency (SECE%).
Among the series of synthesized YVZ nanoparticles, 3-YVZ (3%Y/1%V-ZnO) was found to be the most active photocatalyst for the degradation of organic pollutants under investigation.
For example, N TiO2 is the most active photocatalyst for the degradation of acid orange 7 at pH 3 but is one of the least active at pH 9; Pt/WO3 is the best photocatalyst for the degradation of methylene blue but not much active for the degradation of acid orange 7.
Similar(53)
K-OMS-2 and M-OMS-2 (M = Fe, Ni) with nanorod morphology were the most active photocatalysts.
Of the catalysts which were studied, anatase and titanium oxide impregnated over silica gel were the most active photocatalysts with regard to the degradation rate of phenol, while carbon dioxide formation was fastest over the latter catalyst.
10%TiO2/ZSM-5 and 20%TiO2/SBA-15 proved the most active photocatalysts, exhibiting extraordinary hydrogen evolution rates of 10,000 and 8800 μmol gTiO2−1 h−1 under full arc, associated with high external quantum efficiencies of 12.6% and 5.4% respectively under 365 nm irradiation.
Similarly, ZnO has also proven itself as one of the most active photocatalysts [16].
In addition, the influence of operational parameters such as, catalyst dosage and initial reaction pH was optimized with most active 3-YVZ photocatalyst for degradation of RhB as a function of time.
More suggestions(15)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com