Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
The results of the alkali-silicate reaction (ASR) expansion test suggested that the ASR expansion was decreased in rubberized mortar compared to plain mortar.
Stone matrix asphalt has higher proportion of coarse aggregates and binder mortar compared to conventional mixtures.
The ductility of asphalt mortar, compared to asphalt mixture, is more accurate to reflect the low-temperature ductility.
This paper presents results of an experimental study which investigates the effect of industrial pozzolan made from calcined silt of dam at 750 °C for 5 h, on mechanical properties and durability of ordinary mortar, compared to the silica fume.
High water absorption and lower specific gravity for 13 mm recycled concrete aggregate are due to increased amount of weak attached mortar compared to that for 20 mm recycled concrete aggregate.
Similar(55)
An extensive experimental program was designed to investigate the passivation of reinforced low carbon-release Belite-Ye'elimite-Ferrite (BYF) cement mortars compared to the passivation of reinforced conventional Portland equivalents (OPC).
Test results show that the use of fly ash resulted in significant improvement in compressive strength and substantial decrease in water absorption and capillary pores for blended cement mortars compared to OPC mortar.
Analyzing the result, a lesser extent of compressive strength loss (47.63% in HCl, 39.47% in HNO3, and 3% in Na2SO4) was observed for the hydrogen-rich water-based mortar as compared to that of the control mortar (57.33% in HCl, 55.4% in HNO3, and 14% in Na2SO4) after 180 days exposure.
As expected, SAP increased up to 18% the moisture buffering capacity of the mortar, when compared to the reference sample (0 wt.% SAP).
Despite having a higher SSA, RHA consumes less portlandite but induces similar mortar compressive strength compared to SF.
The results showed that, regardless of aggregate source, the TS model was very suitable in prediction of mortar expansions when compared to those obtained experimentally.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com