Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(40)
Our results suggest that the value of a mortality risk reduction (VSL) is highly sensitive to the survey design.
Indeed, this latter group showed a mortality risk reduction of 83% associated with the addition of TMZ (hazard ratio of 0.17), whereas the reduction was less (60%) in the IGF-IR-positive group (hazard ratio of 0.40).
We develop a numerical life-cycle model with choice over consumption and leisure, stochastic mortality and labor income processes, and calibrated to U.S. data to characterize willingness to pay (WTP) for mortality risk reduction.
Dove-Edwin et al. calculated mortality risk reduction up to 80% by identifying and subsequently screening individuals with an increased familial colorectal cancer (CRC) risk[5].
Woodcock et al. [17, 23] argue that older people would benefit a larger mortality risk reduction from physically active participation compared to younger people, whereas Götschi et al. [4] explained that the impacts of physically active travel is also a function of the current conditions of the travellers.
Among different household goods and housing qualities, there exists a differential mortality risk reduction for different age groups as well.
Similar(19)
This paper examines public valuations of mortality risk reductions.
This paper reports results from a stated preference survey designed to estimate the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Our results suggest that public valuations of mortality risk reductions may underestimate the true societal value because respondents are considering other individuals' welfare, and wrongfully perceive other people's valuations to be low.
Objective To evaluate whether baseline LDL-C level is associated with total and cardiovascular mortality risk reductions.
Early attempts to value mortality risk reductions applied the human capital approach, which estimates the "value of life" as lost productivity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com