mortality range for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "mortality range for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing statistics or studies related to death rates or life expectancy within a specific population or demographic. Example: "The mortality range for individuals aged 65 and older has increased over the past decade, indicating a need for improved healthcare services."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The overall mortality range for Aspergillus infections was 30 90 %, and remained high, irrespective of whether known ICU populations were excluded.

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Previous studies have argued that the DI tends to have a better predictive ability of mortality than the phenotype measurement [ 42], and according to the review by Bouillon et al. [ 1], using the DI or the frailty index, the odds ratios of mortality range from 1.57 to 10.53 for frail individuals relative to non-frail individuals.

BMC Geriatrics

HR estimates for stroke mortality ranged from 0.74 for HAPIEE (CZ) to 1.23 for the Rotterdam Study.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

The AUROCs for the prediction of 30-day mortality ranged from 0.56 for UKELD to 0.79 for MELD and for the prediction of 90-day mortality between 0.68 (UKELD) and 0.84 for MELD (Table  3A).

Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics

The analysis showed robust pooled HR estimates for CVD and stroke mortality, ranging from 0.93 for CVD and 0.94 for stroke (excluding SFAs, PUFAs, or mono- and disaccharides) mortality to 0.96 for CVD (excluding fruit and vegetables) and 0.97 for stroke mortality (excluding PUFAs and fruit and vegetables).

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Age-adjusted hazard ratios for breast cancer mortality ranged from 0.78 for women less than 45 years at oophorectomy to 1.16 for women age 45 to 54 years at surgery [ 10].

Breast Cancer Research

The PSI was developed and validated using data from a large prospective cohort study, in which 30-day mortality ranged from 0.1% for Class I to 27% for Class V for patients.

BMC Health Services Research

Estimated adjusted mortality ranged from 3.0% for patients with door-to-balloon time of 30 minutes to 10.3% for patients with door-to-balloon times of 240 minutes (table 5).

British Medical Journal

Estimated unadjusted mortality ranged from 2.8% for patients with door-to-balloon times of 30 minutes to 9.8% for patients with door-to-balloon times of 240 minutes (table 5).

British Medical Journal

Patients are classified into five risk classes with 30-day mortality ranging from 0.1% for class I to 27% for class V for patients enrolled in the PORT cohort study [ 15].

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

Patients are classified into five risk classes with 30-day mortality ranging from 0.1% for class I to 27% for class V for patients enrolled in the original Patient Outcomes Research Team cohort study [ 17].

Critical Care

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing the "mortality range for" a specific condition or population, always include the timeframe (e.g., 30-day, 1-year) to provide context and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "mortality range for" without specifying the population, condition, and timeframe. For example, instead of saying "the mortality range is high", specify "the mortality range for patients with severe sepsis within 30 days is between 20% and 50%".

Linguistic Context

Grammatical function: The phrase "mortality range for" functions as a noun phrase followed by a preposition, typically used to specify the variation in death rates within a particular context. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is suitable for discussing statistics or studies of death rates.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "mortality range for" is a grammatically sound and useful expression, predominantly found in scientific and medical literature. It describes the spectrum of death rates within a specific context, such as a disease or population. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. When using this phrase, it's essential to provide sufficient context, including the condition, population, and timeframe, to avoid ambiguity. While alternatives like "mortality rate range for" exist, "mortality range for" is direct and effective for formal communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

mortality rate range for

Replaces "range" with "rate range" to emphasize the range of rates.

mortality risk range for

Substitutes "range" with "risk range" to highlight the variation in mortality risk.

mortality spectrum for

Uses "spectrum" instead of "range" to convey a broader, more continuous variation.

mortality variation for

Employs "variation" to suggest differences in mortality outcomes.

mortality span for

Utilizes "span" to indicate the extent of the mortality values.

mortality distribution for

Replaces "range" with "distribution" to emphasize the spread of mortality rates.

mortality interval for

Substitutes "range" with "interval" to specify a defined range.

mortality bracket for

Uses "bracket" to suggest a specific group or category within a range.

mortality scale for

Replaces "range" with "scale" to imply a continuous or graduated variation.

mortality window for

Substitutes "range" with "window" to suggest a specific period or opportunity within the range.

FAQs

How do I use "mortality range for" in a sentence?

You can use "mortality range for" to describe the span of death rates observed in a specific group. For example, "The mortality range for patients with this condition is between 5% and 15%."

What can I say instead of "mortality range for"?

Alternatives include "mortality rate range for", "mortality risk range for", or "mortality spectrum for" depending on the nuance you wish to convey.

Which is correct, "mortality range for" or "death rate range for"?

Both "mortality range for" and "death rate range for" are correct and can be used interchangeably, although "mortality" might be perceived as slightly more formal.

What factors influence the "mortality range for" a disease?

The "mortality range for" a disease can be influenced by factors such as access to healthcare, stage of diagnosis, patient demographics, and treatment options.