Sentence examples for mortality hazards compared from inspiring English sources

Those receiving nafcillin or cefazolin had 79% lower mortality hazards compared with those who received vancomycin alone (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.21; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09, 0.47).

Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess independent mortality hazards comparing nafcillin or cefazolin versus vancomycin.

They found that moderate and severe depression were associated with 29% (95%CI = 3%–61 % and 34% (95%CI = 7%–68%) increase in mortality hazard compared with non-depressed older people, but were unable to demonstrate a clear dose effect of depression partly because of the large number of participants lost during follow up (about 4,000 people).

Tick control was associated with a 49% lower mortality hazard compared to farms that did not control for ticks.

The independent validation study verified that GP88 3+ score was associated with a 5.9-fold higher hazard of disease recurrence and a 2.5-fold higher mortality hazard compared to patients with tumor GP88 < 3+.

The association between mortality risk and OST was driven by the reduction in unnatural deaths, with periods in OST associated with an 87% decrease in mortality hazard compared to time not in OST.

Following multivariate analysis, residing more than 5 km network distance to the nearest health facility was associated with 1.17 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.38) increased child mortality hazard compared to those children who lived <5 km network distance to the nearest health facility.

As defined by MetSyn factors, MNOB (hazard ratio [HR] 2.80 [1.18–6.65]) and MAOB (HR 2.74 [1.46–5.15]) were associated with increased mortality risk compared with MNNW (referent).

Estimated mortality hazard ratios comparing patients lost to follow-up with those remaining in care ranged from 6 to 23.

This is supported by Kim et al. in a study that compared mortality hazards among patients with and without bloodstream infections, stratified by severity of illness.

Unadjusted survival analysis was used to estimate the absolute risk of lung cancer, while Cox regression models compared mortality hazards for lung cancer between smoky and smokeless coal users.