Suggestions(2)
Exact(4)
Mortality hazard was not significantly influenced by education and socioeconomic status.
Mortality hazard was 17% lower in high rainfall than low rainfall periods in under-5s and under-1s (p = 0.02 to p = 0.05).
There were also differences between the sexes at different ages: women's mortality hazard was higher than men's in the 20- to 24-year-old age group; and, from the age of 30, the direction of this association reversed and men's mortality risk was higher than women's such that by their late 40s, women's risk of dying was 60% that of men.
In the first 4 weeks of a prison episode, the all-cause mortality hazard was 94% lower while in OST, compared to being out of OST (adjusted HR (AHR): 0.06; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.48), regardless of gender, indigenous status, age, incarceration history or offending history (table 4).
Similar(56)
The results of this study indicate that the 6-year adjusted mortality hazard is twice as high for men with depression compared with non-depressed men and that the use of antidepressants is associated with an independent rise in mortality of 30%.
The mortality hazard is age-dependent.
We have shown that if the expected mortality hazard is not taken into account, the overall mortality hazard will be more important and never reach zero.
In relative survival, the total mortality hazard is assumed to consist of the general population mortality hazard and of an excess hazard which is attributable to cancer.
In three of the four study sites with available data, the mortality hazard is significantly elevated among patients who accessed treatment in the early rollout stages.
We used a relative survival model in which the excess mortality hazard is estimated with a maximum likelihood approach from individual tumour records (Estève et al, 1990).
Under the proportional hazards specification of the Weibull model and given a set of covariates, Xj, the age-specific mortality hazard is given by: h aget|Xj = ptp−1 exp(β0 + XjβX) where p represents the change in mortality by age.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com