Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(55)
We also compared two logistic regression models predicting mortality at one year based on the presence of clinical diagnoses present at baseline: (1) A model predicting 1-year mortality based on the 1995 2001 merged data, using ICD-9-CM coding, and (2) a model predicting 1-year mortality based on the 2002 2005 merged data using ICD-10 coding.
We obtained information on cardiovascular mortality at one year's follow-up (mean 310 (SD 113) days) by telephone interview or mail from the patient, the patient's relatives, or the treating physician.
There was also an evaluation of the effect of PTX3 levels on the combined end-point of left ventricular dysfunction and mortality at one year.
Mortality at one year after hospital discharge was 46.3%.
We used a similar model to estimate the associations with mortality at one year as the outcome.
Mortality at one year was 9% in the PCCP patients (7 of 76) and 41% in the GN patients (20 of 48).
Similar(5)
Mortality at one-year post ART initiation estimated by Method 1 was 1.7% (1.3% 2.2%), revised to 3.4% (2.9%–4.0%) by Method 2, 10.5% (8.7%–12.3%) by Method 3 and 10.7% (8.9%–12.6%) by Method 4. We present data from AMPATH, a large PEPFAR-funded HIV clinical care program in western Kenya.
Mortality at one-year was significantly lower in patients exposed to skeletal muscle relaxants (AOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.94).
Previous work has shown that older age and male gender are significantly associated with mortality up to 5-10 yeafterfthe the fracture [ 11, 30] and cognitive problems are significantly associated with mortality at 12 and 24 months after sustaining a fracture with a 1.5 times higher mortality risk at one year than those without comorbidities upon admission [ 20, 31].
Today, infant mortality is at one in two hundred.
CHF has a high mortality (30% at one year, and 60%70%% after 5 years), [2] and is one of the leading causes of death in industrialized countries (Braunwald 1997).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com