Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
However, most morphs do not show a consistent habitat pattern.
The morphs do not differ in microhabitat preferences, including vegetation cover [ 24]; however, vegetation cover may affect signal efficacy by altering light conditions [ 63] or obscuring colour signals.
However, a recent study found that the plumage morphs do not differ in genome-wide heterozygosity, estimated from 18 microsatellites [ 22].
We also show that female morphs do not differently allocate resources into quantitative or qualitative fecundity traits, although this does not exclude the potential for alternative reproductive tactics in this system.
Though the power of the statistical analysis is low, the large variation in the mating frequency among individual males suggests that morphs do not differ strongly in this respect.
Although observed differences may relate to differences in 'maturity' of invasive populations and differences in the time of arrival to Africa, LMI morphs do not appear to have displayed elevated ecophenotyic plasticity before.
Similar(52)
Concerning the colour of markings, longitudinal morphs and horizontal morphs had contrasting white markings, whereas non-marked morphs and spotted morphs did not (Figure 1).
Furthermore, this result shows that the slightly greater performance for the more extreme morphs does not simply reflect a greater average distance between these morphs and their comparison stimuli.
The frequencies of horizontal morphs and spotted morphs did not differ between the grass and sand microhabitats (Pearson's Chi-squared test with Yate's continuity correction; non-marked: χ2 = 1.64, df = 1, p = 0.203; horizontal: χ2 = 0.0183, df = 1, p = 0.9904; Figure 3).
Furthermore, in a congener species, R. robini, mating success of male morphs did not depend on their proportions in a colony (Radwan and Klimas 2001).
Finally, when controlling for spatial and temporal variation, female morphs did not differ in egg number (F1,537 = 0.08, P = 0.78) or egg mass (F1,518 = 0.99, P = 0.32).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com