Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Survival and morphometric results are expressed as means ± s.e.m.m
Our morphometric results are in accordance to the hypothesis of background pixels detection, since we observed that myelinated fibers area and diameter are significantly larger with the automatic morphometry, while the axon area and diameter are significantly smaller with this method, when compared to the semiautomated one.
Similar(58)
Morphometric results were: (1) the nuclear volume exponentially increased with age between 20 and 43 weeks; (2) the histograms of neuronal profile areas showed a non-normal distribution trailing toward the right and widening with age; (3) the geometric average of neuronal profile areas increased linearly with age.
The morphometric results were expressed as mean values and standard deviation.
The MR morphometric analysis results are well supported by the measurement of the relative cerebellar weight during postmortem exam.
These results are consistent with traditional morphometric and geometric morphometric analyses of skull shape in carnivorous mammals suggest that Dasyuromorphia and Carnivora are part of a continuum of carnivorous skull shapes [ 41- 43].
Although brain structural deficits have been repeatedly associated with bipolar disorder (BD), inconsistency in morphometric results has been a feature of neuroimaging studies.
The smears fixed with glutaraldehyde method is recommended for a more practical use than with fresh samples, providing better quality images than the other methods, and because the morphometric results obtained were more similar to the FRESH group than those of the DRIED and MET.
We expected that brain morphometric results could be influenced by the ICV of the subjects.
The methodologies adopted for the computation of morphometric parameters are given in Table 2 and results are presented in Table 3.
Results are presented as mean ± SD, morphometric data are given as mean ± SEM.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com