Suggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Only one morphometric cluster was found for each crater lake, suggesting no intralacustrine differentiation.
Similar(59)
Given the large number of sub-watersheds and morphometric parameters, hierarchical clustering was used to group the sub-watersheds into three major categories (that represent low, moderate, and high values) according to the four morphometric aspects.
Hierarchical clustering was calculated with Cluster [61].
Supervised clustering was performed.
Analyses of morphological and mtDNA sequence data of C. ravus specimens are congruent and place these individuals into the C. major morphometric cluster and mtDNA clade B. There is no evidence to suggest that C. ravus represents a distinct genetic lineage within the larger C. major group and we conclude that C. ravus is synonymous with C. major.
Analyses of C. adipicaudatus museum specimens invariably place individuals into the C. medius morphometric cluster and mtDNA clade.
Clusters are like continents.
Six clusters were identified.
The overall grouping structure based on morphometric features was visualized using the hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA).
Species names could be unambiguously assigned to morphometric clusters.
Morphometric analysis was carried out for their 14n sub-watersheds.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com