Ai Feedback
Exact(8)
Further, surface morphologies were measured by AFM.
The morphologies were measured by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-200CX).
The samples' surface morphologies were measured by scanning electron microscopy [SEM] and atomic force microscopy [AFM].
The as-sprayed deposit morphologies were measured by means of a laser sensor.
The phase structures and morphologies were measured by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM).
Aging curves at temperatures of 120, 160, 200 and 240 °C were established and the corresponding precipitate spacings, sizes, and morphologies were measured using TEM.
Similar(52)
Nine discrete morphological characters of flower and fruit morphology were measured from specimens at BISH, NY, PTBG, and US and ten morphological characters were derived from species descriptions ([ 29, 30] Table 2).
The effects of overexpression of miR-875 and miR-3144 onuclearar morphology were measured by Hoechst 33258 staining, since the morphological changes in the nuclear chromatin is indicative of the apoptotic process.
Changes in mandibular morphology were measured from radiographs of disarticluated hemimandibles.
The micelle size and morphology were measured by DLS, AFM and TEM.
The breaking time, surface temperature, total heat flux, heat release rate, and crack and fallout morphology were measured and analyzed.
Related(20)
patterns were measured
morphologies were compared
morphologies were calculated
morphologies were assessed
morphologies were evaluated
morphologies were obtained
morphologies were favored
morphologies were detected
morphologies were seen
morphologies were synthesized
morphologies were investigated
morphologies were observed
morphologies were surveyed
morphologies were analysed
morphologies were examined
morphologies were characterized
morphologies were prepared
morphologies were simulated
morphologies were proposed
morphologies were studied
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com