Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
Figure 1d e shows the typical morphologies of sample obtained from different concentration of 6b.
The InAs QD densities and morphologies of sample A1 and A2 were characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM).
Figure 13 SEM morphologies of sample (a) after 1 wetting-drying cycles of untreated sample (b) after 28 wetting-drying cycles of untreated sample (c) after 28 wetting-drying cycles of Primal SF treated sample.
Figure 11 SEM morphologies of sample (a) untreated (b) surface of sample treated by Primal SF (c) interior of sample treated by PrimalSF (d) surface of sample treated by hybrid material (e) interior of sample treated by hybrid material.
The morphologies of sample scaffolds after cross-linking with GA at different processing setups are shown in Figure 3.
Similar(55)
The morphologies of samples were analyzed using SEM.
The structures and morphologies of samples are investigated.
Damage morphologies of samples were observed by Leica-DMRXE Microscope.
(c) and (d) present the surface morphologies of samples annealed at 550°C and 850°C, respectively.
The morphologies of samples were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL-6700F).
The surface morphologies of samples are characterized using scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hitachi S-4800).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com