Sentence examples for morphological variables for from inspiring English sources

This result confirms the importance of the morphological variables for soot discrimination.

These results highlight again the importance of morphological variables for carbonaceous particles discrimination and in particular for soot particles.

These results highlight the importance of morphological variables for soot and biological particle discrimination, in fact these particles are not differentiated by the use of only chemical variables in the PCA (Figure 1).

Discriminant analysis indicated that the OPK3 width, length of the PM2, length of the buccal field, the body width, L W ratio, the body length, the OPK1 width and the distance between OPK2 and OPK3 were the most important morphological variables for discriminating the isolates.

Secondly, traditional morphometric measurements in the form of inter-landmark distances (ILD; revered as truss nets in Bookstein, 1991) were used as morphological variables (for details see Maderbacher et al., 2008), resulting in 19 discrete morphological measurements revered as ILD 1 19 (Fig.  2).

Thus, as maximum head width is often considered a standard proxy for body size (Hölldobler and Wilson 1990), we used only this morphological variable for subsequent analyses.

The significant correlations between BAI and morphological variables of crown projection area and crown volume are promising for developing approaches to assess the productivity of P. euphratica stands on a landscape level using methods of remote sensing.

These cyclic patterns can be identified and characterized by analyzing the distribution of variation in morphological attributes within neighborhoods defined by windows of appropriate dimensions and shape, as morphological variables computed for any given cell describe only a small portion of the total cyclic variation that characterizes a repeating landform type.

Canonical discriminant analysis (CDA) of the morphological variables accounted for most of the variation (82.2% in the first two dimensions, comprising 61.9 and 20.3%, respectively) and correctly assigned individuals to species in 92.7% of cases (n = 110; Figure  1; Table  1).

The calculated results for morphological variables such as the thickness of crystalline layers and their overall span agreed well with the experimentally measured values.

For significantly variable call characters, among-population coefficients of variation were on average more than three times as large as those coefficients for morphological variables.