Sentence examples for morphological size of from inspiring English sources

Moore and Moore (1971) stated that the correlation of frequency range with the morphological size of the LSO and the MNTB suggests that the hypertrophy of these nuclei represents a specialisation in high-frequency reception.

Does the skeletal sample from Palau [7], [8] fall within observed morphological size ranges of extant small-bodied humans and is the skeletal sample homogenous or heterogenous?

The fourth sample was found to have the same mtDNA type and morphological size as one of the three individuals concluded to be a replicate sample.

Evolutionarily the Fairmead Landfill sloths show a suite of morphological, size and proportional characters that indicate they represent transitional populations between older and younger members of their respective lineages.

Although CTGF alone had no capability for the differentiation of osteoclasts (data not shown), M-CSF/RANKL-mediated osteoclastogenesis was enhanced by the presence of CTGF not only in the morphological size but also in the number of osteoclasts and this enhancing effect was neutralized by anti-CTGF antibody.

It was important to quantify the amount of carboxyl groups on the microbeads surface, the functionality of these carboxyl groups, as well as investigate the morphological (size and shape) and fluorescence stability of the encoded microbeads.

SEM/EDAX (JEOL JSM-6390LV) and TEM Philipss; CM 200) were used to find the morphological and size of the ZnO NPs.

For the quality evaluation by morphological features with size of main root and color of outer bark should be restricted to the samples from the same growing area with the same harvest season and cultivation technique.

Because such cells emerge from confluent cultures, proliferate and have the morphological appearance and size of cardiac progenitor cells [2], [33], we dubbed them myocyte-derived cells (MDCs) and subjected them to further characterization.

On this basis, the integrated fluctuating asymmetry index was calculated using the normalized difference algorithm (Zakharov et al. 2000): where L ij and R ij are the values of the jth character on the right and left sides of the ith leaf, respectively; m number of studied morphological characters; n sample size of leaves.

It can be due to the increase in the size of morphological patterns on the surface of sample L10.