Exact(1)
Adsorption results normalized to surface area indicate that small changes in carbonate percentage at a similar morphological scale did not provide enough carbonate incorporation to show statistical differences in peptide adsorption.
Similar(59)
The scale does not vary.
Scale does pose challenges.
These patterns are thus consistent with those that would be predicted for mitigating metabolic scaling constraints, which may be involved in driving the observed morphological scaling patterns.
In addition, because ecological performance and morphological divergence do not necessarily scale linearly across adaptive radiations, even seemingly small phenotypic differences can have profound implications for evolution (Gray et al. 2005; Parsons and Robinson 2006; Parsons et al. 2011a).
But scale they did.
These morphological characters do not vary within littorale across elevation.
Fossils complete enough for morphological classification do not exist from most sites in the Altai.
Any observed morphological variability could have arisen on a very short (e.g. 20,000 year) time scale and does not necessarily correspond to persistence in glacial refugia over hundreds of thousands or more years.
Morphological analysis is done using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM).
Scale really does matter.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com