While maxillary, orbital and supraorbital morphology varies within the assemblage, several unifying morphological features are notable and serve to unify the sample.
In some species only a few morphological features are retarded, but the number of features retarded may differ from species to species.
However, as molecular evidence accumulates for distinguishing families and relationships within Asparagales, additional and new morphological features are being identified for recognizing these taxa.
Geometrical and morphological features are then recognized.
More details about the morphological features are described in [21, 29].
Four different morphological features are extracted from resampled heartbeats by each of three methods.
The morphological features are described by the porosity and pore-level Sauter mean diameter.
Some of these morphological features are critical in the modeling of catalyst deactivation under diffusion control.
Through this approach elastomeric microlens arrays having different morphological features are obtainable in a fast and simple way.
More recent studies, however, have shown that many of our morphological features are, on the contrary, peramorphic (see Minugh-Purvis and McNamara 2002 for a review).
The observed accuracy values using the SVM classifier for textural features and morphological features are varied from 66.66% to 90.83% and 61.66% to 85.83% respectively.
