Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
As with transgenic plants generated by biolistic transformation, no morphological differences were observed among the different lines or between transgenics and controls.
Flexible flocs and compact granules were both found in the system, and this morphological differences were basically caused by the different microbial compositions, that is, flocs mainly consisted of filamentous bacteria and granules dominated by anammox bacteria.
No morphological differences were found among growth cones at different points along the corticothalamic pathway at a given age.
Furthermore, morphological differences were obviously present between higher order structures formed by the different isomers.
Morphological differences were clearly observed for tubules generated by both hECFCs and HMVECs at differing oxygen tensions.
The morphological differences were analyzed by SEM measurements.
Peary caribou are the smallest subspecies of caribou and, because of their morphological differences, were once considered a separate species.
Pellet formation was the predominant growth form and no morphological differences were observed between treatments.
However, cell proliferation was greatly reduced in co-culture and morphological differences were observed.
By electrical characterization, morphological differences were found to affect the electrical properties markedly.
No significant morphological differences were found between the flight, ground control and clinorotated treatments for either the cotyledons or hypocotyls.
More suggestions(15)
morphological characters were
morphological identifications were
morphological filters were
morphological shifts were
morphological populations were
morphological markers were
morphological studies were
morphological datasets were
morphological structures were
morphological reconstructions were
morphological changes were
morphological properties were
morphological features were
morphological investigations were
morphological affinities were
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com