Sentence examples for morphological differences that from inspiring English sources

Evidence for ecological speciation in these species pairs includes the rapid evolution of reproductive isolation (e.g., separate breeding times, paucity of morphological hybrids) and the parallel evolution of inherited morphological differences that indicate specialization for different niches [ 7].

Adult sexes can be distinguished by means of readily observed morphological differences that are easily seen with the naked eye.

Key morphological differences that distinguish C. canadensis from C. elaphus are the former's wider rump patch and paler-hued antlers.

There are few morphological differences that distinguish the extinct insular emus from the mainland emu besides their size, but all three taxa were most often considered distinct species.

In 1886 Golgi described the morphological differences that are still used to distinguish two malaria parasite species Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium malariae.

This functional disparity led us to examine the respective mammary phenotypes for morphological differences that may yield insight into the corresponding pathobiological mechanisms.

They noted that fruit bodies of S. subluteus collected in Minnesota did not have the strong salmon colors considered characteristic of S. salmonicolor, as well as collections that had been named S. pinorigidus; this is a morphological difference that could be sufficient to consider S. subluteus a distinct species.

Although the biological species concept (BSC; groups of actually or potentially inter-breeding natural populations, which are reproductively isolated from other such groups) [19], is accepted by most zoologists, species descriptions and names are most often based on morphological difference that should be shown to be non-overlapping between species.

The only morphological difference that occurred only on the very softest substrates was a more roundish shape of myocytes with possibly slightly less aligned myofibrils.

Thirdly, it could be that speciation events do not always match morphological differences, indicating that rapid changes in morphology can occur with minimal evolutionary change (Adams et al. 2002).

These morphological differences indicate that the deformation and the orientation behavior of the polymers' domains differ.