Sentence examples for morphological differences often from inspiring English sources

Because morphological differences often involve the modification of basic developmental processes, careful study of these traits can also reveal developmental mechanisms of patterning, growth and size control (Stern 2000).

Isatis L. species from the Brassicaceae, displays morphological polymorphism and these morphological differences are often masked, even in fruits, which display the most valuable diagnostic features (Davis 1965;Hedge 1968 Jafri 1973: cited in Moazzeni et al. 2007).

This is a good target for such a study because species identification and delimitation of cephalotrichids is hampered by subtle morphological differences that often are difficult to describe unambiguously [16] [18], which has led to a confusing taxonomic literature, thereby further complicating the issue of species delimitation in this taxon.

Subtle morphological differences have often formed the basis for taxon recognition within the complex, resulting in different taxonomic treatments of the Elymus dahurica complex.

Morphological differences between species often involve changes at multiple genetic loci, as revealed by F2 quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping (e.g., Alpert et al. 1995, Orr 2001, Gadau et al. 2002).

Resource competition between sympatric species can produce morphological differences between those species, often resulting in ecological divergence.

In other words, he points out that there are often obvious morphological differences across what we consider to be different races but he demonstrates that "they're not representative of the genome as a whole".

Morphological differences in the frustule are often subtle and with the advent of scanning electron microscopy, additional morphological features were visible and many new species were described [ 13].

However, the inter-generic relationships of the genus remain an open question, due to limited and often ambiguous morphological differences among comparable genera and their equally uncertain circumscription.

Interneurons of all 3 clusters showed a so-called "fast-spiking" (FS) firing pattern, independent of their often substantial morphological differences (see Fig.  3 C1–3).

Although changes in developmental programs are most often associated with morphological differences (size and shape), heterochronic changes have been identified for a variety of traits including bone ossification [ 31, 32], brain differentiation [ 33], pigment patterning [ 34] and social behavior [ 35].