Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
Some combined studies in 2000 and 2001, using both molecular and morphological data, support brachiopods as Lophotrochozoa, while others in 1998 and 2004 concluded that brachiopods were deuterostomes.
Accordingly, the available morphological data support, albeit equivocally, the interpretation that Zhuchengceratops was more closely related to Leptoceratops than to Udanoceratops (it should be noted that not all of these features were included in the numerical phylogenetic analyses).
Morphological data support a sister taxon relationship between the two spotted dolphin species.
Both molecular and morphological data support Echiura and Siboglinidae as annelids [ 7- 14].
Other phylogenetic studies based on nuclear genes, or on a combined analysis of molecular and morphological data, support a closer relationship between Maxillopoda + Malacostraca [ 18, 50].
For example, several molecular studies have suggested paraphyly of Rodentia or Glires [ 1- 3], while others (and the majority of morphological data) support the monophyly of both groups [ 4- 6].
Similar(51)
d Morphology-based hypothesis [ 3] We acknowledge, however, that no morphological data supports a sister-group relationship between the Chaunacoidei and Ceratioidei ([ 33] but see [ 32]).
Morphological data supporting the results of this article are included within Additional file 1: Table S1.
This may therefore add a molecular perspective to the body of hitherto exclusively morphological data supporting the Atelocerata.
Our recent phylogenetic reconstruction of anomurans based on molecular and morphological data supports the traditional "hermit to king" hypothesis in congruence with all recent studies [ 19- 21, 33, 59].
Morphological data supported the monophyly of Geophila, mainly based on two synapomorphies, i.e., the loss of heterostrophy and the presence of eyes at the tip of the ocular tentacles [ 1].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com