Sentence examples for morphological comparisons of from inspiring English sources

This assumption, based on morphological comparisons of fossils, conflicts with a 2006 genetic analysis which indicates raccoons are more closely related to ringtails.

Molecular and morphological comparisons of Patagonian species suggest that the number of nominal species in Nacella was overestimated [ 17, 46].

On average, this decrease amounted to 30 50% of normal in postmortem morphological comparisons of pancreatic samples from non-diabetic and type 2 diabetic subjects [ 3– 7].

We examined human brains at 6 and 7 GWs and made morphological comparisons of the components of the forebrain hem system between human and mouse (Fig.  7).

Through morphological comparisons of the pest D. suzukii with its close relatives, the authors propose an evolutionary model to explain the modification of the ovipositor that allows puncture of susceptible fruits, demonstrating the utility of an evolutionary framework for addressing questions of pest emergence and management.

Although detailed morphological comparisons of the hypocretin system between different PFC regions and layers are not available, heavy HCRTR-1 protein labeling is present in the primary and secondary motor areas in the rat (Hervieu et al. 2001), and HCRTR-1 mRNA is generally detected in layer V (Marcus et al. 2001).

Figure 1 Morphological comparison of Tongil and parental lines.

There are two major findings from the morphological comparison of the images.

To perform a morphological comparison of capsulotomy edges generated by commercially available femtosecond lasers with manual capsulorhexis.

Morphological comparison of untreated and acid-treated CNFs was performed using an SEM model JSM800 manufactured by JEOL at 20 kV acceleration voltage at room temperature.

Table 2 Morphological comparison of architecture design characteristics Method Shape configurable structuring element Addresses image boundary Duality efficient architecture Grayscale support Deforges et al. [29] ✗ ✓ ✗ ✓ Holzer et al. [25] ✗ ✗ ✗ ✓ Genovese et al. [34] ✗ ✗ ✓ ✗ Bartovsky et al. [32] ✗ ✗ ✗ ✓ Proposed method ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓.