Sentence examples for morphologic variability from inspiring English sources

Adenocarcinomas with a high degree of morphologic variability are the most common ovarian tumors in hens.

First, because of the use of a composite femur model, morphologic variability as encountered in the operating room is absent.

Despite their species richness, wide distribution, and enormous ecological and morphologic variability, however, iguanas possess great stability of sex chromosomes (Rovatsos et al. 2014b) that is comparable with the well-documented cases of birds (ca 120 Mya according to Mank and Ellegren 2007) and therian mammals (ca 166 Mya based on Veyrunes et al. 2008).

The cause of this stochastic behaviour can be owed to several complex phenomena such as inter-neuron morphologic variabilities, chaotic motion of charge carriers due to thermal noise, ionic conductance noise, and other background noise [109].

Ichnodisparity has been recently introduced as a concept to assess the variability of morphologic plans in biogenic structures, revealing major innovations in body plan, locomotory system and/or behavioral program.

Therefore, further analysis of differential protein profiles of these glioma types may help to: 1) refine the histopathologic diagnosis, currently based mainly in morphologic characteristics, with large interobserver variability [ 17, 18], and 2) detect molecular targets that may explain the difference of clinical outcome between low grade astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma.

Due to the known inter-observer variability in the detailed morphologic classification of non-GBM in particular [ 10], we did not attempt to sub-classify these tumors into the traditional categories of astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, and mixed oligoastrocytoma or by grade.

Besides, the possibility of an adaption of the VOI shape according to individual morphologic properties, an explanation for the low variability of the crescent-shaped VOI approach might be that the summation of six crescent-shaped ROIs led to relatively large volumes, which could also contribute to the higher stability.

However, inter- and intraobserver variability is a problem inherent to morphologic tumour classification and grading (Sloane et al, 1998); moreover, heterogeneity within DCIS lesions is not uncommon, resulting in variation in grade (Ma et al, 2003).

Morphologic appearance is highly heterogeneous and probably heavily influenced by interreader variability.

The diagnosis of IM is currently based on the histology of biopsy specimens because IM usually appears in flat mucosa and has few morphologic changes, and identification of IM by conventional endoscopy has high interobserver variability and a poor correlation with histological findings.