I think, therefore, that no more words need be lost in rebuttal of this charge.
Thus there were more words that needed to be rejected (non-targets require a NO response) as compared to words to be recognized (targets require a YES response) resulting in an unequal ratio of NO and YES responses.
It often uses more words than needed, obscures meaning, leads to ambiguity and misunderstanding, patronises and annoys people, helps makes public service ineffective and doesn't do your reputation any good.
"No more words are needed, now … is the time to apply the recommendations".
So that's about 500 more words than needed to be said on this, but these comparisons persist after so long that I feel I have to just engrave it on the internet that they're not admissible evidence, and the whole idea of a comparison is silly anyway.
At a time like this, often no more words are needed but a great deal of comfort is essential.
The pamphlet explains that the dictionary's editors were looking for quotations for three reasons: First, some words don't have any quotations, or only one, and the editors simply need more; second, some words need more current quotations; and third, as is still the case with many of today's online appeals, the editors need to find earlier — ideally the earliest — use of a particular word.
All the more reason why these words need to be enshrined in a national memorial to Eisenhower.
Many words are skipped during reading, so that foveal processing is not necessary for all words, while some words need more than a single fixation, which causes refixations on the same word.
It should use no more words than are needed to do the job and they should be the right words.
