As validation is an iterative process to accumulate validity evidence in order to make a convincing validity argument (e.g., Chapelle et al. 2008), more validation studies need to be conducted.
More validation studies need to be performed.
Despite this, the improvement by ReliefF is around 1% compared with other methods and therefore, although statistically significant, this may be also due to the bias inherited from the dataset, therefore more validation is needed.
However, more validation is needed.
However, more validation is needed if these QTSs will be extended to other populations with different genetic background.
However, more validation is needed of the link made between the 10 indicators and the classification into types of collaboration.
Therefore, the performance of the HABC-M cognitive scale compared with the MMSE is encouraging; however, these results are only preliminary and more validation is needed.
Thus, although the HABC-Monitor demonstrated good reliability and validity in the present study, more validation studies are needed.
Although more validation work is needed, the present results suggest that the models can be considered as a tool for canopy flux predictions in the paddy field.
More validation evidence is needed in the future.
