Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(28)
We quantified 1315 proteins with two or more unique peptides, 116 of which showed altered changes.
Protein quantification data with two or more unique peptides identified with confidence > 99% and the p value < 0.05 were selective for further statistical analysis.
In all 1303 proteins were identified as having 3 or more unique peptides.
The false positive protein identification rate for proteins identified with 2 or more unique peptides was zero.
Of these, eight proteins were identified based on two or more unique peptides (Table 2) and in 22 the identification was based on a single peptide (Table 3).
For example, 2547 proteins from the R. sphaeroides proteome database, including 141 proteins expressed from the core genome, were identified by 2 or more unique peptides (5.5%).
Similar(32)
Only proteins with two or more unique peptide hits were considered for further analysis.
It contained 2,096 proteins identified from two or more unique peptide sequences.
Similar numbers of peptides are identified by both approaches but the CID-only experiments resulted in approximately 12% more unique peptide identifications.
Positive identification of a protein required identification of three or more unique peptide sequences identified with ions scores of greater than 95% significance.
This priority system is based on the quality of the amino acid sequence identification (peptide ID confidence) and whether one or more unique peptide sequences were identified (multiple sequences).
More suggestions(15)
more unique opportunities
more unique uses
more abundant peptides
more active peptides
more unique approaches
more unique visitors
more unique favorites
more unique experiences
more stable peptides
more conserved peptides
more diverse peptides
more unique artists
more unique things
more unique experimentations
more unique variations
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com