Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
Only proteins with two or more unique peptide hits were considered for further analysis.
It contained 2,096 proteins identified from two or more unique peptide sequences.
Similar numbers of peptides are identified by both approaches but the CID-only experiments resulted in approximately 12% more unique peptide identifications.
Positive identification of a protein required identification of three or more unique peptide sequences identified with ions scores of greater than 95% significance.
This priority system is based on the quality of the amino acid sequence identification (peptide ID confidence) and whether one or more unique peptide sequences were identified (multiple sequences).
Similar(55)
We quantified 1315 proteins with two or more unique peptides, 116 of which showed altered changes.
Protein quantification data with two or more unique peptides identified with confidence > 99% and the p value < 0.05 were selective for further statistical analysis.
In all 1303 proteins were identified as having 3 or more unique peptides.
The false positive protein identification rate for proteins identified with 2 or more unique peptides was zero.
In this study, all peptides assigned to more than one protein were only retained if the protein in question had an additional two or more unique peptides.
Of these, eight proteins were identified based on two or more unique peptides (Table 2) and in 22 the identification was based on a single peptide (Table 3).
Related(20)
more particular peptide
more specific peptide
more unique travel
more detailed peptide
more active peptide
more ancient peptide
more unique energy
more complete peptide
more stable peptide
more unique programming
more unique place
more hydrophobic peptide
more powerful peptide
more distinct peptide
more unique policy
more unique name
more confident peptide
more restricted peptide
more viral peptide
more tryptic peptide
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com