Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
more tighter
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "more tighter" is not correct or usable in written English.
To properly use the phrase "more tight", you can use it to describe something that has become more compact or secure. For example, "The knot was pulled more tight to ensure it would stay in place."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
7 human-written examples
"I am more tighter reined on the designation side," he said in a 1989 interview.
News & Media
(i) More tighter bounds of FDA beampattern deviation are derived.
M-matrix, we may obtain a more tighter bound.
However, we think it is necessary to obtain a more tighter bound for a reachable set.
★: Additionally, WDII technique is taken into account to bound the time-derivative of triple integral LKFs, which provide more tighter bounding technology for dealing with such LKFs.
This technique was initially developed by [38], and it was shown to be more tighter than those used in [8 13, 16, 19, 20].
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
53 human-written examples
Security is more tight".
News & Media
One more tight over required now.
News & Media
Guys seem a little more tight".
News & Media
Said Mr. He: "There will be more distribution of resources and more tight political control".
News & Media
Spaniards, struggling with falling household incomes and loans, have become more tight-fisted.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using double comparatives like "more tighter". Instead, use either "tighter" or "more tight" depending on the intended meaning. For example, use "tighter" when comparing two things and indicating one is more constricted, and "more tight" to increase the level of tightness.
Common error
A common mistake is using double comparatives. Saying "more tighter" is redundant. Instead, choose the correct comparative form: either use "tighter" alone, or rephrase to use "more" with the base adjective such as "more tight".
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "more tighter" functions as a comparative adjective phrase, although grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI indicates that the proper way to express this concept is to use "more tight" or, preferably, "tighter". It aims to describe a state of increased constriction or security, but its non-standard construction undermines its effectiveness.
Frequent in
Science
33%
News & Media
67%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "more tighter" is generally considered grammatically incorrect due to the double comparative. As Ludwig AI points out, it's better to use either "tighter" or "more tight", depending on the intended emphasis. While the phrase does appear in some contexts, primarily in news and scientific media, it's advisable to avoid it in formal writing. Instead, consider using alternatives like "tighter", "more secure", or "more restrictive" for clarity and grammatical correctness.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
tighter
Omits "more" to correct the double comparative error, retaining the core meaning of increased constriction or security.
increasingly tight
Uses "increasingly" to convey a gradual tightening or increase in restriction, avoiding the double comparative.
more secure
Replaces "tighter" with "secure", focusing on the aspect of increased security or stability.
more restrictive
Replaces "tighter" with "restrictive", emphasizing the aspect of increased limitations or controls.
more constricted
Substitutes "tighter" with "constricted" to emphasize the aspect of reduced space or movement.
more stringently
Replaces "tighter" with "stringently", focusing on stricter enforcement or adherence to rules.
more firmly
Replaces "tighter" with "firmly", shifting the emphasis to increased firmness or stability.
more compact
Replaces "tighter" with "compact", focusing on the aspect of being more closely and neatly packed together.
more closely
Replaces "tighter" with "closely", focusing on proximity or reduced distance.
better constrained
Substitutes the phrase for one conveying improved limitation or control, suitable in technical contexts.
FAQs
Is it grammatically correct to say "more tighter"?
No, the phrase "more tighter" is grammatically incorrect. It's a double comparative, which is generally considered an error in standard English. You should use either "tighter" or "more tight".
What's the difference between "more tight" and "tighter"?
"Tighter" is the comparative form of "tight", used when comparing two things to indicate one is more constricted or secure. "More tight" is less common but can be used to emphasize an increased level of tightness. However, it's often better to use "tighter" for brevity and clarity.
What can I say instead of "more tighter"?
Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "tighter", "more secure", or "more restrictive". The best choice depends on the specific meaning you want to convey.
When should I use "tighter" instead of "more tight"?
Use "tighter" when you are directly comparing two things and want to indicate that one is more constricted, secure, or controlled than the other. It's generally the preferred and more concise option.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested