Sentence examples for more thorough diagnostic from inspiring English sources

Although screening interviews or questionnaires may be structured, open-ended, or a combination of both approaches, they are not considered substitutes for more thorough diagnostic workups.

These concerns ensured that rating scales were seen less as bureaucratic instruments and more as a crucial first step in identifying recipients of drug treatments, prompting the development of more thorough diagnostic tests from the 1980s onwards.

Of the 527 herds available, 21 herds that had a missing answer on PCVAD status were excluded from subsequent analysis; in eight herds, data on PCVAD were not collected, as a subsequent herd visit with more thorough diagnostic follow-up was arranged during the interview; and in 13 herds, the producer responded that the question was not applicable.

[ 24- 26] The following groups of patients underwent this more thorough diagnostic work-up at the participating AIEOP centers: patients with acute myeloid leukemia; patients with de novo or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia while on induction or re-induction therapy; patients undergoing HSCT; patients with prolonged severe neutropenia or on steroid therapy.

This is consistent with a previous study of diagnostic testing by Sox et al [ 20] that showed reduced anxiety among patients who were randomised to a more thorough outpatient diagnostic work-up for non-specific chest pain, but inconsistent with the findings of a study of exercise testing by Channer et al [ 21] that found no evidence of reassurance.

More thorough analysis using diagnostic positions and comparisons of intron-exon structure could be used to clarify the relation of the different paralogs of these families.

The literature suggests that structured reporting in radiology leads to clearer and more thorough communication of relevant diagnostic findings than does conventional, free-form reporting.

With its expansive comparative approach, the platform hopes to offer vastly more thorough, precise and user-specific diagnostic information relative to existing consumer alternatives, like WebMD or, what Bloch calls "Dr. Google," which often produce broad, downright frightening and inaccurate diagnoses. .

For a thorough understanding of case/control data, especially when comparing the relative contribution of different pathogens to the overall burden of disease, we need a more thorough understanding of the performance of diagnostic procedures as used on samples from cases and controls.

Rare headaches are unlikely to be of public-health interest unless severe, which opens up a possible alternative method for case-ascertainment: the screening of large clinical populations (eg, general practitioners' clinical files) for potential cases, and then a more thorough clinical expert interview of these for diagnostic confirmation [44].

We suggest that a more thorough clinical characterization of patients may provide diagnostic clues, which may guide the otherwise inefficient candidate gene approach in combined respiratory chain deficiency.