Sentence examples for more substantial action from inspiring English sources
"A more substantial action would be the release of files on Turing's secret work for GCHQ in the cold war.
But the modesty of the 0.25 percentage point move means there's scope for more substantial action on the country's too-cheap currency.
But the main point of today's extraordinary meeting may have been to create an air of urgency that would elicit faster and more substantial action from the government on the banking industry's problems, analysts said.
American participants in Study 1 rated participation as a significantly more substantial action when agreement was purportedly obtained under opt-in rather than opt-out conditions, and nonagreement as a greater abrogation of responsibility when that decision was made under opt-out rather than under opt-in conditions.
But the fans ate it up, down to his growly "Yo!" But it was lost on no one that Mr. Schwarzenegger's appearance marks his return to a film career that will find him taking more substantial action roles, even though he will qualify for Medicare upon turning 65 this month.
But in another example of the gradual chiselling away of already-fragile legal precedent, some suspect the case is returning to court primarily because of its ability to have an impact on two more substantial affirmative action cases pending against Harvard University and the University of North Carolina.
Cary Coglianese, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, faulted the list for including many deregulatory actions that were relatively minor, compared with the more substantial regulatory actions.
Both require that the core be properly positioned and firmly supported, yet Acheulean toolmaking involves both a greater diversity of technical actions and more substantial changes in core morphology as the core is shaped into a pointed, thin and symmetrical 'handaxe'handaxe
"That frees up government resources to address more substantial issues" like the recent commission action against Toysmart, a bankrupt company that tried to sell its mailing list data -- including information about children -- despite longstanding promises to keep such information private.
Without more substantial evidence, they are limited in their actions.
Justice Ginsburg counts the case as one for her side on the basis of nothing more substantial than the Courts characterization of the agency action at issue as blatantly lawless, id., at 238.
