In [4], it was observed that there are examples which are quasi-paranormal but not paranormal, as well as quasi-paranormal but not quasi-class A. We give a more simple example which is quasi-paranormal but not quasi-class A. To construct this example we recall the following lemma in [4].
To describe this in more detail, a simple example network with 3 buses and 3 branches (i.e. L1, L2 and L3) with anticipated N-1 outage of L3 is shown in Fig. 1 below.
Don't think of anything elaborate (for example, 'I did not see the Loch Ness Monster'), instead try more simple and far more common things (example, 'I did not read a book today.').
This analysis leads us to conclude that the adversary is requesting 21312, because the adversary wants to impersonate B. This example is far more simple than the situations encountered in practice, but it illustrates the basic idea.
These simple examples show that much more is possible in the absence of a world state than realists acknowledge.
The methods are demonstrated for simple examples and for a more complex model of NF- κB pathway.
Some simple examples help demonstrate the idea (more can be found in Lin and Huang 2011).
Although we used deliberately simple examples, the "real world" isn't that much more complex.
The method is applied both to simple examples to explore known identifiability properties and to a more complex example to illustrate its utility.
