Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
This difference could be due to our more sensitive analytic methods.
Similar(11)
The present study was conducted with a more quantitative approach and with a larger number of participants in order to determine what elements of organization raters are more sensitive to when assigning analytic scores for organization.
The research question for the study is: Are raters more sensitive to paragraphing, the use of cohesive devices or coherence when rating timed writing for organization using an analytic rating scale?
Methods using C combined with GC-CIRMS are more sensitive than deuterium or C on gas chromatography mass spectrometry, allowing for smaller isotope doses to give an adequate analytic signal (1 compared with 17.5 μmol) (28).
Generally, he's more sensitive.
This makes it more sensitive.
Others are more sensitive.
Should we have been more sensitive?
Some organs were more sensitive than others.
We are more sensitive to danger.
Even more sensitive is agricultural trade.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com