Sentence examples for more robust review from inspiring English sources

Additionally, neurological policy will need to support a more robust review of diagnostic and care pathway use to reduce avoidable expenditures, and test and implement bundled payments for key neurological diagnoses.

As issues surrounding social equity and ecological efficiency associated with genetically modified foods are being debated in the public realm, we propose that it is necessary to move beyond the priorities of a market commodity and engage in a more robust review of sociological factors.

James O'Reilly, a professor at the University of Cincinnati College of Law, says the FDA essentially abdicated its responsibility as a food regulator in 1997, when it proposed rules to streamline a more robust review process that had become backlogged.

Green groups submitted more than 400,000 comments to the State Department in support of a more robust review, said Anthony Swift, an attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council.

In contrast to the unsystematic narrative review by Goette et al. (2010), based on a mixture of observational and experimental studies, the results of our more robust review do not corroborate their conclusions that incentives increase blood donation.

In conclusion, we suggest that this review would have been greatly improved by a more robust systematic review design, incorporating other databases, as well as foreign language and unpublished data, in the search.

On the other hand, a requirement, which the detainees seek, for a more robust appellate review could strengthen the government's hand in arguing that there is no need for habeas corpus after all.

Administration officials said they were simply trying to create a more robust regulatory review process as the state tries to revive the upstate economy and tackle a $24.4 billion budget deficit over the next three years.

An Imperial College spokeswoman said: "The College has taken a number of actions to improve its culture of care since 2012 [including] revised governance structure; more robust ethical review process; better systems for training and sharing good practice".

Napoli et al. (2014, p. 1096) reported limitations related to the loss of a more robust literature review, suggesting that the scale developed in the study may have been incorrectly operationalized: "Yet some question remains as to whether cultural symbolism should form part of this scale.

This misrepresentation is even more robust in review articles.