Sentence examples for more restrictive thresholds from inspiring English sources

For the identification of overrepresented binding sites in large gene sets, it is advisable to use more restrictive thresholds (a smaller number of random matches).

As suggested by Field (2009) [ 31], a sample size of 50 individuals can be satisfactory for factor analysis, if more restrictive thresholds for interpretation of factor loading are employed.

The use of institutional transfusion protocols was associated with more restrictive thresholds, especially in grade 1 SAH patients (mean Hb with transfusion protocol, 7.70 g/dL (95% CI, 7.54 to 7.87); mean Hb without protocol, 7.98 g/dL (95% CI, 7.80 to 8.16); P = 0.01).

However, the overriding purpose of maintaining a more restrictive threshold for initiation is unstated in policy: it acts as a form of rationing treatment.

The value of the E-field is 27.1 V/m; this involves that the more restrictive threshold of 3 V/m, established in the International Electrotechnical Commission Standard of Electromedical Devices [ 8], is exceeded.

The LO-mTLE group showed more varied levels of BC at the different statistical thresholds for the non-ictal hippocampus, with low values at the more restrictive threshold (5, 10 %) and higher values for the less restrictive thresholds (30, 35%%).

In the cases of very small distances from the tested device, the highest level of E-field strength exceeds the more restrictive threshold of 3 V/m that is established in the International Electrotechnical Commission Standard of Electromedical Devices [ 8].

Therefore, the BEDROC score for high values of α should not be interpreted too precisely for the more restrictive AD thresholds.

The results show that their values are close to the recommended 0.80 threshold for acceptable fit (Scott 1994; Bagozzi and Yi 1988), but do not meet the more restrictive 0.90 threshold level (Bollen 1989); whereas AGFI, which is a measure that represents overall degree of fit (squared residuals from prediction compared to the actual data), is on the low side.

For multiple comparisons, a more restrictive significance threshold for p value was used by a Bonferroni's correction for multiple comparisons.

Thus, we choose to set a more restrictive significance threshold (than p < 0.05 corrected) at p < 0.001 uncorrected for multiple comparisons.